Would I Lie To You? Fairness and Deception in Rhetorical Dialogues
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper focuses on dialoguing environments where agents need to exchange evaluating judgments on particular topics, as opposed to discuss about the truth or falsity of propositions. The paper argues that rhetorical argumentation is an appropriate metaphor to model these situations, and presents a framework based on a well established theory from the philosophy of argumentation. The framework is presented, and some examples are given that show the potentialities of the characterisation.
منابع مشابه
Invoking the Feigner in Us Methodological Approaches for Investigating Deception in fMRI Setting
The attempt to find out if someone is telling a lie has been of human's interest. One of the techniques which is believed to be efficient in future is fMRI (functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging), using which the changes of regional blood flow during the designed paradigm can be recorded. This method has been considered as a better technique for studying lie and deception. For investigating th...
متن کامل“Can You Remember What Was in Your Pocket When You Were Stung by a Bee?”: Eliciting Cues to Deception by Asking the Unanticipated
In this paper we focused on children’s deception (10-12 years, Experiment 1), and adult’s ability detect deception in children (Experiment 2). The self-presentational perspective (DePaulo, 1992) suggests that both liars and truth tellers will try to act in a convincing manner to be assessed as truth tellers. By asking unanticipated questions we put the liars in the following dilemma: If they di...
متن کامل(When) Would I Lie To You? Comment on “Deception: The Role of Consequences”∗
This paper reconsiders the evidence on lying or deception presented in Gneezy (2005, American Economic Review). We argue that Gneezy’s data cannot reject the hypothesis that people are one of two kinds: either a person will never lie, or a person will lie whenever she prefers the outcome obtained by lying over the outcome obtained by telling the truth. This implies that so long as lying induces...
متن کاملCentre De Referència En Economia Analítica Barcelona Economics Working Paper Series Working Paper Nº 281 (when) Would I Lie to You? Comment on " Deception: the Role of Consequences " Sjaak Hurkens and Navin Kartik Barcelona Economics Wp Nº 281
This paper reconsiders the evidence on lying or deception presented in Gneezy (2005, American Economic Review). We argue that Gneezy’s data cannot reject the hypothesis that people are one of two kinds: either a person will never lie, or a person will lie whenever she prefers the outcome obtained by lying over the outcome obtained by telling the truth. This implies that so long as lying induces...
متن کاملWould I Lie To You? On Social Preferences and Lying Aversion∗
This paper reinterprets the evidence on lying or deception presented in Gneezy (2005, American Economic Review). We show that Gneezy’s data are consistent with the simple hypothesis that people are one of two kinds: either a person will never lie, or a person will lie whenever she prefers the outcome obtained by lying over the outcome obtained by telling the truth. This implies that so long as ...
متن کامل